Violence on the frontier went both ways, with both sides committing what would now be termed atrocities, but were at the time justified as self defense. The case of Hannah Dustin of Haverhill, Massachusetts is one such event.
Hannah Emmerson (1657-c 1737) was the oldest of 15 children. Her family had already appeared in the local records when one of her sisters was convicted of infanticide and hanged. At the age of 20, Hannah married Thomas Dustin, a farmer who supplemented their income by making bricks. Nine children followed and nothing else seemed remarkable about their life together. However, during King William's War (1688-1697), Abenaki warriors working for the French staged a raid on Haverhill, Massachusetts. Thomas was able to gather the oldest 8 children and flee with them into the woods. Hannah, her six-day-old baby girl Martha, and her nursemaid Mary Neff were captured and forced to march into the wilderness. As was common practice during these marches, the warriors seized little Martha out of Hannah's arms and smashed the infant's head against a tree.
The two women were assigned to a Native American family which included another captive, a teenager named Samuel Lennardson. They continued their journey to what is now Penacook, New Hampshire. There, while their host family lay asleep, Hannah found a small hatchet (not necessarily a tomahawk). She killed one of the men of the family while Lennardson found a weapon and slew the other. They and Mary Neff also killed eight other members of the family. Only an old woman and an older child, both severely wounded, escaped to tell the tale. Then, the three Settlers took scalps to prove the incident, found a canoe and headed back to Haverhill, traveling by water and only at night so as not to be detected. The Massachusetts General Court awarded Hannah 25 pounds in scalp bounty. Lennardson and Neff divided another 25 between themselves. In those days, this was not an insignificant sum of money.
Hannah and Thomas reunited their family and there the matter rested. Hannah later told her story to Cotton Mather, who included it in one of his many books about the history of New England. But it wasn't until the 19th century, when writers like Nathaneal Hawthorne, John Greenleaf Whittier and Henry David Thoreau came along that the story was embellished and dramatized. Several memorials were erected to Hannah around Massachusetts but her story remains controversial today. Was her action self-defense, or murder in vengeance for her infant daughter? By retelling her story, would that be considered glorifying violence toward Native Americans? By making her a heroine, was that not racism? I'll leave that for the reader to decide, I'm just reporting the facts.
Gayusuta and Washington
Showing posts with label scalp bounties. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scalp bounties. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Did It Happen: Henry Hamilton the Hair Buyer
Scalping remains one of the most controversial topics in Early Frontier history. Who was the first to do it? Who did more of it? Why? Those questions aren't part of the purpose of this blog. Scalping is an ancient practice with evidence seen in many civilizations around the world, from the Scythians in the ancient world, to the Visigoths in the twilight of the Roman Empire, to the Dahomey in Africa. Evidence of scalping injuries on skulls date from pre-contact North America. At its most basic, scalping was a convenient, if bloody and painful way of counting enemy dead and proving which soldier or warrior had killed enemy and how many. Enough said.
One practice that was routine on the frontier was the issuing of scalp bounties to anyone who had killed a Native man, woman or child, whether in battle or other circumstance. Some examples will suffice. Massachusetts and Connecticut authorities offered bounties during the Pequot War in the 1630's. Authorities in New France also offered scalp bounties in their ongoing conflicts with the Iroquois in the Beaver Wars. Massachusetts offered scalp bounties in most of the wars we have discussed, Queen Anne's War, Father Rale's War, King George's War, and the list goes on. English authorities in Nova Scotia also offered scalp bounties during their conflicts with the Mikmaq and other tribes. The last war in which Colonial governments offered scalp bounties was the French and Indian War (1755-1762), in which both Massachusetts and Pennsylvania offered bounties for Native scalps of men, women and children.
Did it happen during the Revolution? And, if so, by whom?
The most obvious candidate in this scenario is Lieutenant Governor Henry Hamilton. Hamilton was born in Ireland and entered the British Army in the French and Indian War. Connections and luck sponsored his rise through the ranks until, in 1775, he was appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec and Superintendent of Indian Affairs, based out of Fort Detroit. His orders called for him to encourage and support Native auxiliaries in their attacks on frontier outposts and settlements. In his own correspondence, he worried about excesses by Natives and tried to make sure, as much as it was in his power, that Native war parties were accompanied by or under the control of British Regular or Loyalist commanders. As we've seen, this didn't stop the cruelty by both Whites and Natives on either side. If anything, it exacerbated the problem. Not only that, but Native leaders and Loyalists for whom military discipline held no appeal often operated on their own. Many people were killed and scalped, by both Loyalists and Natives, as well as Patriots and Natives. As a disproportionate amount of the behavior seemed to be with British controlled units it was easy to see how a rumor got started and became "fact". The reason the Natives were so eager to take scalps had to be that the British were subsidizing them to do so.
While Americans such as George Rogers Clark were certain that the impetus for American attacks on the frontier came from Fort Detroit, there is no written or other evidence that Hamilton ever offered a scalp bounty. Unlike many British commanders, Henry Hamilton seemed to have developed a respect for Natives, learning much about the various tribes, making detailed drawings and leaving notes about the things he had learned. The Americans could have cared less about his views on the Natives, though, and branded him a war criminal. In February, 1779, Clark recapture Fort Vincennes and sent Hamilton to Williamsburg, Virginia, where Governor Thomas Jefferson ordered him clapped in irons until Washington decided what to do with him. He was eventually sent to New York, exchanged and left for England and other service. That he wasn't tried might be an indicator that, for all the rumors, nobody at that time could find any evidence that he was paying for scalps, either.
One practice that was routine on the frontier was the issuing of scalp bounties to anyone who had killed a Native man, woman or child, whether in battle or other circumstance. Some examples will suffice. Massachusetts and Connecticut authorities offered bounties during the Pequot War in the 1630's. Authorities in New France also offered scalp bounties in their ongoing conflicts with the Iroquois in the Beaver Wars. Massachusetts offered scalp bounties in most of the wars we have discussed, Queen Anne's War, Father Rale's War, King George's War, and the list goes on. English authorities in Nova Scotia also offered scalp bounties during their conflicts with the Mikmaq and other tribes. The last war in which Colonial governments offered scalp bounties was the French and Indian War (1755-1762), in which both Massachusetts and Pennsylvania offered bounties for Native scalps of men, women and children.
Did it happen during the Revolution? And, if so, by whom?
The most obvious candidate in this scenario is Lieutenant Governor Henry Hamilton. Hamilton was born in Ireland and entered the British Army in the French and Indian War. Connections and luck sponsored his rise through the ranks until, in 1775, he was appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec and Superintendent of Indian Affairs, based out of Fort Detroit. His orders called for him to encourage and support Native auxiliaries in their attacks on frontier outposts and settlements. In his own correspondence, he worried about excesses by Natives and tried to make sure, as much as it was in his power, that Native war parties were accompanied by or under the control of British Regular or Loyalist commanders. As we've seen, this didn't stop the cruelty by both Whites and Natives on either side. If anything, it exacerbated the problem. Not only that, but Native leaders and Loyalists for whom military discipline held no appeal often operated on their own. Many people were killed and scalped, by both Loyalists and Natives, as well as Patriots and Natives. As a disproportionate amount of the behavior seemed to be with British controlled units it was easy to see how a rumor got started and became "fact". The reason the Natives were so eager to take scalps had to be that the British were subsidizing them to do so.
While Americans such as George Rogers Clark were certain that the impetus for American attacks on the frontier came from Fort Detroit, there is no written or other evidence that Hamilton ever offered a scalp bounty. Unlike many British commanders, Henry Hamilton seemed to have developed a respect for Natives, learning much about the various tribes, making detailed drawings and leaving notes about the things he had learned. The Americans could have cared less about his views on the Natives, though, and branded him a war criminal. In February, 1779, Clark recapture Fort Vincennes and sent Hamilton to Williamsburg, Virginia, where Governor Thomas Jefferson ordered him clapped in irons until Washington decided what to do with him. He was eventually sent to New York, exchanged and left for England and other service. That he wasn't tried might be an indicator that, for all the rumors, nobody at that time could find any evidence that he was paying for scalps, either.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

